Equal Justice Under Law
 
— BACK TO PREVIOUS LOCATION —
Background  Case Calendar  More Options
 
— SIGN TULANELINK'S PETITION —
 
— South Dakota's Ballot Initiative —
 
— Connecticut's Court Critics —
 
— Controlling Connecticut's Judiciary —
Critiques of the Judiciary
 
Q:  Can a judge place his thumb on the scales of justice to tilt them in a favored direction?
------------
A:  Yes.  Judicial independence and the doctrine of judicial immunity give judges this privilege.

"Equal Justice Under Law"
 
(As Currently Practiced in the U.S.)
The media (ABC News) deserves credit for investigating and bringing to the public's attention another example of injustice that is symptomatic of a judiciary whose independence has allowed judges to express their prejudices through the sentences and orders they impose on those who come before them.  Such judicial misconduct has spawned a citizens' movement determined to curb the immunity that allows judges to abuse their authority with impunity.
 

Weighting the Scales of Justice
 
Two Men, Same Judge, Very Different Outcomes
 
JIM AVILA, JOAN MARTELLI and CONNIE CLARKE
 
November 4, 2006
 

Do you believe the scales of justice tilt in favor of the rich and powerful? To explore this question, "20/20" went to Texas to examine the fate of two men who came before the same judge.

Alex Wood was accused of killing a male prostitute in Dallas in 1995. He pleaded not guilty and went to trial. According to prosecutor Rick Jordan, the evidence against Wood was incontrovertible: He had shot an unarmed man in the back.

But just as the jury was about to conclude its deliberations, Jordan struck a plea bargain: In exchange for a guilty plea, Wood would be given 10 years of probation and no jail time. Jordan's explanation for striking such a lenient deal? He believed the jury was sympathetic to Wood, and Jordan worried it might acquit Wood altogether.

Maybe it would have. Wood had no criminal history and came from a wealthy and well-connected Texas family. Wood's father, the Rev. John Alvin Wood, is a retired pastor of the First Baptist Church of Waco and a former regent of Baylor University. He's also a big game hunter and fossil collector whose private museum was recently featured in National Geographic.

Wood's sister is married to eight-term congressman Chet Edwards, whose vast district, the 17th Congressional District of Texas, extends from the Fort Worth suburbs in the north to the Bryan-College Station area in the south.

Wood himself dabbled in the genteel business of breeding and showing dogs, specifically Pharaoh Hounds — an exotic breed whose lineage can be traced back to ancient Egypt.

At trial, Wood was represented by top defense attorneys who described the victim as violent and aggressive, and argued that Wood shot the man in self-defense. Even more important, given the location of the trial — the Bible Belt South — they brought in several prominent members of the Baptist church as character witnesses.

Among them was O.S. Hawkins, the exceedingly urbane pastor of the First Baptist Church of Dallas, and a true celebrity among Baptist officials. Said Jordan of some of the women jury members, "When O.S. Hawkins came in, it was like they wanted to crawl over the rail and just kiss the ring."

Strategic Move by the Prosecutor

Another reason Jordan agreed to the plea was that he expected Wood to violate probation and end up in jail anyway.

Wood did, indeed, violate probation. First, he tested positive for cocaine use, and shortly after that he and another man were arrested when they were found with crack cocaine in one of Congressman Chet Edwards' cars. Citing the failed drug test and the arrest, prosecutors went to Judge Keith Dean, the original trial judge, and asked him to revoke Wood's probation.

Dean, who serves at the 265th Criminal District Court of Dallas County, and who has been elected to the bench four times, is described as a good, committed judge. But he allowed Wood to remain out on bail for several months, during which time Wood failed two more drug tests.

In the end, Dean let Wood enter a private inpatient treatment center rather than go to jail. In another lucky break, prosecutors decided not to pursue the crack charges against Wood.

But Wood continued to get into trouble — and continued to escape the consequences. In a dispute over a puppy, dog trainer Margaret Worth said Wood broke into her home. After Wood's father intervened, Worth agreed not to press charges.

Two Court Cases, Same Judge, Varied Treatment

Last year one of Wood's high-powered lawyers asked Dean to shave a year off Wood's sentence and grant him early release from probation. Dean refused but instead agreed to a "postcard" probation in which Wood could simply write to the court once a year. Wood, now 46 years old, has remained free.

The same can't be said for Tyrone Brown, another man who came before Judge Dean.

Back in 1990, when Brown was 17, he and a friend pulled a gun on a Dallas man and demanded his wallet. After taking $2, they handed the wallet back and fled but were quickly caught. When Brown appeared before Dean, he didn't have a high-powered lawyer. Brown was one of five children who grew up in a poor home and never finished high school. The Baptist church he attended was the little Telstar Baptist Church in Dallas, which cannot claim a single prominent member.

Brown, who had a few minor juvenile offenses on his record, pleaded guilty, and he, too, was sentenced to 10 years' probation.

Like Wood, he also violated probation, although only once, and he only got caught smoking marijuana. But when Brown was called before Dean, what happened to him was markedly different from what happened to Wood. Dean sentenced Brown to life in prison, then added, "Good luck, Mr. Brown."  Brown's court-appointed attorney, Matt Fry, didn't protest.

Nora Brown, Tyrone's mother, recalled that she broke down when her son called her with the news. "'Mama,' he said, 'they gave me life.'  I just started crying, you know, and I started screaming. And I said 'Baby, how can they give you life. For what?'"

"20/20" correspondent Jim Avila spoke to Dean, who is running for re-election, during a campaign event in Dallas. Avila asked the judge about why he ruled so differently in the two cases. Dean insisted the law and the "ethical code of judicial conduct says I can't talk about any case at any point."

However, Seanna Willing, the executive director of the Texas Commission on Judicial Conduct, told "20/20" Dean is incorrect. She said there is nothing to prevent a judge from talking about cases that are no longer pending.

Wood has finished his probation and is a free man. Brown has been in prison more than 16 years. He's struggled with depression, tried committing suicide, and got into trouble after joining a gang and fighting with prison guards. In recent years, he has settled down, and now says he spends time reading and writing poetry. He's eligible for parole in 2009.

Copyright 2006, ABC News Internet Ventures
 

From: ABC News, November 4, 2006, http://www.abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2618531&page=1, accessed November 15, 2006.  Reprinted in accordance with the "fair use" provision of Title 17 U.S.C. § 107 for a non-profit educational purpose.
 

 
CONNECTICUT JUDICIARY   SOUTH DAKOTA'S BALLOT INITIATIVE
 
Help Balance the Scales of Justice!
 
Help Balance the Scales of Justice!
Censure Judge Berrigan? Send a message to Congress now!
          Send a Message to Congress!        
 
Web site created November, 1998     This section last modified November, 2006
 
|  Home Page  |  Site Map  |  About Bernofsky  |  Curriculum Vitae  |  Lawsuits  |  Case Calendar  |

|  Judicial Misconduct  |  Judicial Reform  |  Contact  |  Interviews  |  Disclaimer  |
 
This Web site is not associated with Tulane University or its affiliates

© 1998-2014 Carl Bernofsky - All rights reserved
send me an e-mail